How AI Toolkit verifies tools and compatibility
Understand official evidence, documented compatibility, unknown pricing, publication revisions and the limits of AI Toolkit's verification method.
Each published card describes a tool using reviewed source material. A compatibility claim belongs to a named AI system and a specific interface, not to every product that supports a similar protocol.
What counts as evidence
We use official product documentation, publisher repositories and platform directories. A material fact is associated with a source and a check date. A page returning HTTP 200 only confirms that it can be reached; it does not confirm an unchanged price or supported connection.
Documentation and practical tests
The catalog currently reports documented capabilities. It does not claim that we installed every skill, connected every account or tested every action. A README example can differ from a built-in implementation. Check the interface, transport, authorization and conditions shown on the card.
How costs are described
Tool access, the host AI plan, API usage and hosting can have separate costs. We publish a specific amount only when the reviewed source establishes it. Unknown pricing means the amount or complete model was not confirmed; it does not mean free.
Updates and corrections
Published versions retain their supporting facts and compatibility snapshot. Changed documentation, inaccessible sources and expired evidence require revalidation. Temporary source errors do not by themselves prove a product is closed. Some sources can block automated requests; in that case a previous check is not silently renewed.
Translations share the same underlying published facts. Selection pages collect tools for a specific task; their order is not a performance ranking. Send a card URL and an official supporting source through project contacts to request a correction.